Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui

363 papers and 330 indexed citations i.

About

The 363 papers published in Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui in the last decades have received a total of 330 indexed citations. Papers published in Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (321 papers), Philosophy (247 papers) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (67 papers) specifically the topics of Samuel Beckett and Modernism (321 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (227 papers) and Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence (88 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui are Dirk Van Hülle, Matthew Feldman, Angela Moorjani, Chris Ackerley, S. E. Gontarski, Anthony Cordingley, Greg Garrard, Julie Campbell, Shane Weller and Mark Nixon.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui.

Countries where authors publish in Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025