Renascence

530 citations
468 papers · · active since 1951

Impact in

    • American and British Literature Analysis
    • Modernist Literature and Criticism
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism
    • Modern American Literature Studies
    • Evelyn Waugh and Hans Urs von Balthasar Studies
    • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
    • Renaissance Literature and Culture

Papers in

    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism 308
    • American and British Literature Analysis 87
    • Modernist Literature and Criticism 59
    • Contemporary Literature and Criticism 47
    • Evelyn Waugh and Hans Urs von Balthasar Studies 35
    • Modern American Literature Studies 21
    • Autobiographical and Biographical Writing 19
    • Renaissance Literature and Culture 31

Renascence

147 papers receiving 271 citations

Peers

Renascence
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Literature and Literary Theory 269
  • Classics 61
  • Philosophy 78
  • History 55
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 30
Replace Symposium A Quarterly Journal in Modern Literatures with:
Symposium A Quarterly Journal in Modern Literatures United States
Zeitschrift für Germanistik
Fabula United States
Minnesota Review United States
Orbis Litterarum United States
Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies United States
Internationales Archiv für Sozialgeschichte der deutschen Literatur Germany
The Cambridge Quarterly United Kingdom
Daphnis Germany
LIT Literature Interpretation Theory United States
Renascence relative to Symposium A Quarterly Journal in Modern Literatures United States Symposium A Quarterly Journal in Modern Literatures's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Symposium A Quarterly Journal in Modern Literatures · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Renascence

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Renascence. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Renascence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Renascence more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Renascence

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Renascence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Renascence.

About Renascence

The 468 papers published in Renascence in the last decades have received a total of 530 indexed citations . Papers published in Renascence usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (430 papers), Classics (43 papers), History (45 papers), Philosophy (36 papers) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (22 papers) specifically the topics of Poetry Analysis and Criticism (308 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (87 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (59 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (47 papers), Evelyn Waugh and Hans Urs von Balthasar Studies (35 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (31 papers), Modern American Literature Studies (21 papers) and Autobiographical and Biographical Writing (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Renascence are Thomas Hill Schaub, Wesley Trimpi, John Coates, Jeffrey M. Perl, Nicholas Davey, Melissa E. Sanchez, Joseph Schwartz, David William Foster, Jan W. Wojcik and Dorothy A. Winsor.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact