James Joyce quarterly

367 papers and 320 indexed citations i.

About

The 367 papers published in James Joyce quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 320 indexed citations. Papers published in James Joyce quarterly usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (268 papers), Sociology and Political Science (112 papers) and Philosophy (48 papers) specifically the topics of Modernist Literature and Criticism (192 papers), Samuel Beckett and Modernism (109 papers) and Irish and British Studies (95 papers). The most active scholars publishing in James Joyce quarterly are Michael Groden, Sam Slote, Len Platt, Hugh Kenner, Margot Norris, David Hayman, Pamela L. Caughie, Jonathan Lewis, Daniel Ferrer and Gregory Castle.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in James Joyce quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in James Joyce quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in James Joyce quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in James Joyce quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in James Joyce quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in James Joyce quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Joyce quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025