General Arts and Humanities

11.5k papers and 20.8k indexed citations i.

About

11.5k papers covering General Arts and Humanities have received a total of 20.8k indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Italian Literature and Culture, Cultural and Mythological Studies and Italian Fascism and Post-war Society and also cover the fields of Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory and Artificial Intelligence. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory and History. Some of the most active scholars covering General Arts and Humanities are Maria Cecí­lia de Souza Minayo, Michael J. Chandler, Adriana Cavarero, Giuliana Bruno, Eric H. Lenneberg, Roger Brown, William Damon, Carlos Alberto Scolari, Umberto Eco and Paddy Scannell.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about General Arts and Humanities

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering General Arts and Humanities. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering General Arts and Humanities.

Countries where authors publish papers about General Arts and Humanities

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in General Arts and Humanities. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about General Arts and Humanities with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites General Arts and Humanities more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025