John Pilling

2.7k citations
95 papers · 1.8k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

John Pilling

71 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

John Pilling
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Literature and Literary Theory 474
  • Philosophy 344
  • Metals and Alloys 73
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 140
  • Mechanical Engineering 970
Replace J. C. Conway with:
J. C. Conway United States
Francis R. Jones United Kingdom
Yoshikazu NAKAI Japan
Colin Sterling United States
William Kurz United States
Jinfang Peng China
Mohammad Taghi Salehi Iran
M. Aksoy Türkiye
V.G. Gavriljuk Ukraine
A.D. Krawitz United States
John Pilling relative to J. C. Conway United States J. C. Conway's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×50×114.7×
J. C. Conway · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Pilling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Pilling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Pilling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Pilling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Pilling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Pilling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Pilling. The network helps show where John Pilling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Pilling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Pilling Line = papers co-authored together John Pilling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 95 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Superplasticity in Crystalline Solids
1989269
2 1996149
3 1986123
4 1982108
5 200078
6 198474
7 198170
8 198866
9 198963
10 198754
11 198551
12 200649
13 199047
14 200545
15
Beckett's Dream notebook
199944
16 199443
17 199232
18 198931
19
Collected Poems of Samuel Beckett
201228
20 199225

About John Pilling

John Pilling is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Mechanical Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 95 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Samuel Beckett and Modernism (50 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (42 papers), Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence (24 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (14 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (6 papers), Advanced ceramic materials synthesis (6 papers), Metal Forming Simulation Techniques (5 papers) and Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (474 citations), Philosophy (344 citations), Metals and Alloys (73 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (140 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (970 citations). John Pilling has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include N. Ridley, A. Hellawell, James Knowlson, Martha Fehsenfeld, Samuel Beckett, J.B. Hawkyard, D. W. Livesey, Muhammad Islam, Robin W. Grimes and Mark Pitkin. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Materials Science and Technology, Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, Materials Science and Engineering A and The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact