Journal of Beckett Studies

262 papers and 248 indexed citations i.

About

The 262 papers published in Journal of Beckett Studies in the last decades have received a total of 248 indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Beckett Studies usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (209 papers), Philosophy (165 papers) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (75 papers) specifically the topics of Samuel Beckett and Modernism (206 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (150 papers) and Theatre and Performance Studies (75 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Beckett Studies are Laura Salisbury, Steven Connor, Chris Ackerley, Ulrika Maude, Theodor W. Adorno, Dirk Van Hülle, Mark Nixon, Anna McMullan, Enoch Brater and Katherine Weiss.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Beckett Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Beckett Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Beckett Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Beckett Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Beckett Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Beckett Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Beckett Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025