Romanticism on the Net

433 citations
212 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Literature: history, themes, analysis
    • Crime and Detective Fiction Studies
    • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
    • Digital Humanities and Scholarship
    • Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
    • Travel Writing and Literature

Papers in

    • Literature: history, themes, analysis 38
    • Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 11
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism 9
    • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 7
    • Travel Writing and Literature 11
    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes 10

Romanticism on the Net

91 papers receiving 196 citations

Peers

Romanticism on the Net
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Literature and Literary Theory 266
  • History 99
  • Cultural Studies 70
  • Museology 29
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 37
Replace Comparative Critical Studies with:
Comparative Critical Studies United Kingdom
Legacy A Journal of American Women Writers United States
Romance Studies United States
postmedieval a journal of medieval cultural studies United States
Texas Studies in Literature & Language United States
Canadian review of comparative literature Canada
Nottingham French Studies France
Romanticism United Kingdom
Journal of Romance Studies United Kingdom
Studies in American Indian Literatures United States
Romanticism on the Net relative to Comparative Critical Studies United Kingdom Comparative Critical Studies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Comparative Critical Studies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Romanticism on the Net

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Romanticism on the Net. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Romanticism on the Net with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Romanticism on the Net more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Romanticism on the Net

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Romanticism on the Net. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Romanticism on the Net.

About Romanticism on the Net

The 212 papers published in Romanticism on the Net in the last decades have received a total of 433 indexed citations . Papers published in Romanticism on the Net usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (83 papers), History (36 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (14 papers), Philosophy (25 papers) and Museology (7 papers) specifically the topics of Literature: history, themes, analysis (38 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (14 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (11 papers), Travel Writing and Literature (11 papers), Science Education and Perceptions (10 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (10 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (9 papers) and Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (7 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Romanticism on the Net are Jerome McGann, David S. Miall, Peter Otto, Iain McCalman, David Chandler, Nicholas Reid, George E. Haggerty, Robert Alexander, Tim Fulford and Robert Mitchell.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact