Romanticism on the Net

398 citations
201 papers · · active since 1996

Impact in

    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism
    • Historical and Literary Analyses
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis
    • Literature and Culture Studies
    • Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
    • American and British Literature Analysis
    • Digital Humanities and Scholarship
    • Gothic Literature and Media Analysis

Papers in

    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism 73
    • American and British Literature Analysis 41
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis 32
    • Historical and Literary Analyses 28
    • Literature and Culture Studies 21
    • Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics 19
    • Gothic Literature and Media Analysis 29

Romanticism on the Net

127 papers receiving 238 citations

Peers

Romanticism on the Net
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Literature and Literary Theory 231
  • Cultural Studies 91
  • Music 21
  • History 72
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 26
Replace Journal of Transnational American Studies with:
Journal of Transnational American Studies United States
Luso-Brazilian Review United States
Comparative American Studies An International Journal United States
Texas Studies in Literature & Language United States
Comparative Critical Studies United Kingdom
Critical Survey United Kingdom
postmedieval a journal of medieval cultural studies United States
Translation Studies United Kingdom
Journal of Iberian & Latin American Studies United Kingdom
Korean studies Denmark
Romanticism on the Net relative to Journal of Transnational American Studies United States Journal of Transnational American Studies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Journal of Transnational American Studies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Romanticism on the Net

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Romanticism on the Net. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Romanticism on the Net with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Romanticism on the Net more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Romanticism on the Net

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Romanticism on the Net. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Romanticism on the Net.

About Romanticism on the Net

The 201 papers published in Romanticism on the Net in the last decades have received a total of 398 indexed citations . Papers published in Romanticism on the Net usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (163 papers), Cultural Studies (30 papers), History (42 papers), Music (11 papers) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (17 papers) specifically the topics of Poetry Analysis and Criticism (73 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (41 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (32 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (29 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (28 papers), Literature and Culture Studies (21 papers), Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics (19 papers) and Gender and Feminist Studies (16 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Romanticism on the Net are Jerome McGann, David S. Miall, Iain McCalman, David Chandler, Peter Otto, Daniel O’Quinn, George E. Haggerty, Nicholas Reid, Robert Mitchell and Alan Richardson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact