Peter Otto
Impact in
-
- Moravian Church and William Blake
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism
- Literature and Culture Studies
Papers in
-
- Moravian Church and William Blake 15
- Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics 2
-
- Visual Culture and Art Theory 5
- Art, Technology, and Culture 3
- Co-authors
- Klaus Ewe (8 shared papers)Norbert Lehn (1 shared paper)Ekkehard Bayerdörffer (1 shared paper)Markus Ritter (1 shared paper)Beatrix Neubauer (1 shared paper)Moritz Stolte (1 shared paper)Andreas Neubauer (1 shared paper)Christian Thiede (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Peter Otto
25 papers receiving 137 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Medical Terminology 1
- Literature and Literary Theory 56
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 40
- Cultural Studies 22
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 15
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Otto
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Otto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Otto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Otto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Otto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Otto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Otto. The network helps show where Peter Otto may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Peter Otto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 50 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 30 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 27 | |
| 4 | Multiplying Worlds: Romanticism, Modernity, and the Emergence of Virtual Reality | 2011 | 14 |
| 5 | [Collagenous duodenitis and ileitis in a patient with collagenous colitis]. | 1991 | 12 |
| 6 | 2004 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1977 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1979 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1979 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1975 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1976 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1972 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1984 | 1 |
About Peter Otto
Peter Otto is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Cultural Studies, Communication and History, having authored 41 papers that have together received 193 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Moravian Church and William Blake (15 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (5 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (5 papers), Cultural Studies and Postmodernism (4 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (4 papers), Art, Technology, and Culture (3 papers), Medical History and Innovations (2 papers) and Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Terminology (1 citation), Literature and Literary Theory (56 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (40 citations), Cultural Studies (22 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (15 citations). Peter Otto has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Klaus Ewe, Norbert Lehn, Ekkehard Bayerdörffer, Markus Ritter, Beatrix Neubauer, Moritz Stolte, Andreas Neubauer, Christian Thiede, M Stolte and E. Seifert. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Literary Studies, European Romantic Review, Endoscopy, Postcolonial Studies and Eighteenth-Century Fiction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.