Comparative Critical Studies

258 papers and 378 indexed citations i.

About

The 258 papers published in Comparative Critical Studies in the last decades have received a total of 378 indexed citations. Papers published in Comparative Critical Studies usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (84 papers), Sociology and Political Science (54 papers) and Language and Linguistics (43 papers) specifically the topics of Translation Studies and Practices (36 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (20 papers) and European Cultural and National Identity (13 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Comparative Critical Studies are Rosi Braidotti, Susan Bassnett, Kate Soper, Carolyn Steedman, Ben Hutchinson, David Damrosch, Kristin Veel, Jonathan Culler, Karin Littáu and Nicola King.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Comparative Critical Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Comparative Critical Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Comparative Critical Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Comparative Critical Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Comparative Critical Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Comparative Critical Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comparative Critical Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025