Texas Studies in Literature & Language

808 citations
369 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis
    • Contemporary Literature and Criticism
    • American and British Literature Analysis
    • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
    • Medieval Literature and History

Papers in

    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism 44
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis 36
    • American and British Literature Analysis 34
    • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 31
    • Contemporary Literature and Criticism 31
    • Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies 20
    • Medieval Literature and History 27

Texas Studies in Literature & Language

186 papers receiving 431 citations

Peers

Texas Studies in Literature & Language
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Literature and Literary Theory 469
  • Classics 101
  • History 193
  • Cultural Studies 111
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 57
Replace Critical Survey with:
Critical Survey United Kingdom
English Language Notes United States
Hispanic Research Journal United Kingdom
The Cambridge Quarterly United Kingdom
Romance Quarterly United States
˜The œEighteenth century/˜The œeighteenth century (Lubbock, Tex. Online) United States
postmedieval a journal of medieval cultural studies United States
English Literature in Transition 1880-1920 United Kingdom
Philological quarterly United States
Romanticism United Kingdom
Texas Studies in Literature & Language relative to Critical Survey United Kingdom Critical Survey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Critical Survey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Texas Studies in Literature & Language

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Texas Studies in Literature & Language. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Texas Studies in Literature & Language with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Texas Studies in Literature & Language more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Texas Studies in Literature & Language

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Texas Studies in Literature & Language. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Texas Studies in Literature & Language.

About Texas Studies in Literature & Language

The 369 papers published in Texas Studies in Literature & Language in the last decades have received a total of 808 indexed citations . Papers published in Texas Studies in Literature & Language usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (225 papers), Classics (32 papers), History (80 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (25 papers) and Music (14 papers) specifically the topics of Poetry Analysis and Criticism (44 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (36 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (34 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (31 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (31 papers), Medieval Literature and History (27 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (20 papers) and Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (17 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Texas Studies in Literature & Language are Patricia Clare Ingham, Anthony Uhlmann, Dan McIntyre, Charles J. Rzepka, Mark Richardson, Brian N. Williams, Zhang Longxi, Sarah Stanbury, Peter J. Rabinowitz and Luc Herman.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact