Texas Studies in Literature & Language

715 citations
335 papers · · active since 1980

Impact in

  • Classics top 10%
    • Medieval Literature and History
    • Renaissance Literature and Culture
    • American and British Literature Analysis
    • Modernist Literature and Criticism
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism
    • Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis

Papers in

    • American and British Literature Analysis 70
    • Modernist Literature and Criticism 51
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism 38
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis 32
    • Contemporary Literature and Criticism 21
    • Renaissance Literature and Culture 42
    • Medieval Literature and History 21

Texas Studies in Literature & Language

172 papers receiving 342 citations

Peers

Texas Studies in Literature & Language
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Classics 135
  • Literature and Literary Theory 388
  • History 117
  • Cultural Studies 55
  • Religious studies 32
Replace Critical Survey with:
Critical Survey United Kingdom
The Cambridge Quarterly United Kingdom
postmedieval a journal of medieval cultural studies United States
Fabula United States
˜The œEighteenth century/˜The œeighteenth century (Lubbock, Tex. Online) United States
English Language Notes United States
Eighteenth-Century Life United States
Russian History United States
Calíope United States
English Studies in Africa South Africa
Texas Studies in Literature & Language relative to Critical Survey United Kingdom Critical Survey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Critical Survey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Texas Studies in Literature & Language

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Texas Studies in Literature & Language. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Texas Studies in Literature & Language with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Texas Studies in Literature & Language more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Texas Studies in Literature & Language

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Texas Studies in Literature & Language. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Texas Studies in Literature & Language.

About Texas Studies in Literature & Language

The 335 papers published in Texas Studies in Literature & Language in the last decades have received a total of 715 indexed citations . Papers published in Texas Studies in Literature & Language usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (240 papers), Classics (63 papers), History (62 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (20 papers) and Cultural Studies (13 papers) specifically the topics of American and British Literature Analysis (70 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (51 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (42 papers), American Literature and Culture (39 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (38 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (32 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (21 papers) and Medieval Literature and History (21 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Texas Studies in Literature & Language are Patricia Clare Ingham, Dan McIntyre, Anthony Uhlmann, Charles J. Rzepka, Luc Herman, Zhang Longxi, Michael Uebel, Peter J. Rabinowitz, Tobin Siebers and H. Bruce Franklin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact