Critical Survey

391 papers and 589 indexed citations
i
.

About

The 391 papers published in Critical Survey in the last decades have received a total of 589 indexed citations. Papers published in Critical Survey usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (177 papers), Sociology and Political Science (103 papers) and History (68 papers) specifically the topics of Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (54 papers), Irish and British Studies (33 papers) and Literature: history, themes, analysis (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Critical Survey are Josie Billington, Michael Wilding, Graham Holderness, Ágnes Gulyás, R. I. G. Hughes, Liam Harte, Faye Hammill, Richard Brown, Ramona Wray and Heike Bauer.

In The Last Decade

Critical Survey

171 papers receiving 352 citations

Fields of papers published in Critical Survey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Critical Survey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Critical Survey.

Countries where authors publish in Critical Survey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Critical Survey. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Critical Survey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critical Survey more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026