Korean studies

274 papers and 897 indexed citations

About

The 274 papers published in Korean studies in the last decades have received a total of 897 indexed citations. Papers published in Korean studies usually cover Cultural Studies (154 papers), Sociology and Political Science (153 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (19 papers) specifically the topics of Japanese History and Culture (114 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (88 papers) and Chinese history and philosophy (64 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Korean studies are Hagen Koo, Mary Lee, Gil‐Soo Han, Kenneth R. Robinson, Seung-Kyung Kim, Andrew Sangpil Byon, Timothy C. Lim, Andrei Lankov, Jonathan Allen and David G. Victor.

In The Last Decade

Korean studies

159 papers receiving 596 citations

Fields of papers published in Korean studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Korean studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Korean studies.

Countries where authors publish in Korean studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Korean studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Korean studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Korean studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026