Praktyka Teoretyczna

284 papers and 315 indexed citations i.

About

The 284 papers published in Praktyka Teoretyczna in the last decades have received a total of 315 indexed citations. Papers published in Praktyka Teoretyczna usually cover Sociology and Political Science (94 papers), Political Science and International Relations (85 papers) and Education (56 papers) specifically the topics of Education and Cultural Studies (52 papers), Polish Historical and Cultural Studies (41 papers) and Polish-Jewish Holocaust Memory Studies (28 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Praktyka Teoretyczna are Henri Lefebvre, Mimí Sheller, Chris Hann, Wojciech Woźniak, Antonio Negri, Nikolas Rose, Jodi Dean, Gerald Raunig, Louis Althusser and Pierre Bourdieu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Praktyka Teoretyczna

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Praktyka Teoretyczna. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Praktyka Teoretyczna.

Countries where authors publish in Praktyka Teoretyczna

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Praktyka Teoretyczna. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Praktyka Teoretyczna with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Praktyka Teoretyczna more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025