Jodi Dean

5.6k citations
94 papers · 2.5k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Jodi Dean

80 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Jodi Dean
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Communication 581
  • Gender Studies 354
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.4k
  • Urban Studies 169
  • Political Science and International Relations 527
Replace Nico Carpentier with:
Nico Carpentier Belgium
Marwan M. Kraidy United States
Philip Schlesinger United Kingdom
David Croteau United States
Andreas Hepp Germany
Mark Poster United States
Lilie Chouliaraki United Kingdom
Gino Raymond United Kingdom
Kevin Robins United Kingdom
Joshua Meyrowitz United States
Jodi Dean relative to Nico Carpentier Belgium Nico Carpentier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nico Carpentier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jodi Dean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jodi Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jodi Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jodi Dean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jodi Dean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jodi Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jodi Dean. The network helps show where Jodi Dean may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Jodi Dean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jodi Dean Line = papers co-authored together Jodi Dean links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009344
2 2005276
3 2009273
4
Blog Theory: Feedback and Capture in the Circuits of Drive
2010243
5 2002151
6 2003147
7
The Communist Horizon
2012129
8 199695
9 200482
10
Reformatting Politics: Information Technology and Global Civil Society
200658
11 200955
12 200847
13 200142
14
Crowds and Party
201642
15 200941
16
Publicity's secret
200240
17 200139
18
Žižek's politics
200636
19 199536
20 202021

About Jodi Dean

Jodi Dean is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy and Communication, having authored 94 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (15 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (7 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (5 papers), Marxism and Critical Theory (4 papers), Political theory and Gramsci (3 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers) and Digital Games and Media (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (581 citations), Gender Studies (354 citations), Sociology and Political Science (1.4k citations), Urban Studies (169 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (527 citations). Jodi Dean has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Paul A. Passavant, Geert Lovink, Jon Anderson, Petar Jandrić, Davide Panagia, Hubertus Buchstein, Jessica Wang, James Martel, William E. Connolly and Romand Coles. Their work appears in journals such as Constellations, Political Theory, Philosophy & Social Criticism, Cultural Critique and Cultural Politics an International Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact