childhood & philosophy

300 papers and 567 indexed citations

About

The 300 papers published in childhood & philosophy in the last decades have received a total of 567 indexed citations. Papers published in childhood & philosophy usually cover Education (186 papers), Sociology and Political Science (86 papers) and Philosophy (78 papers) specifically the topics of Education and Critical Thinking Development (104 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (39 papers) and Religious Education and Schools (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in childhood & philosophy are Gert Biesta, Darren Chetty, Karin Murris, Marie‐France Daniel, Claire Cassidy, Marta Giménez‐Dasí, Laura Quintanilla, Walter Omar Kohan, Clinton Golding and Joanna Haynes.

In The Last Decade

childhood & philosophy

203 papers receiving 495 citations

Fields of papers published in childhood & philosophy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in childhood & philosophy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in childhood & philosophy.

Countries where authors publish in childhood & philosophy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in childhood & philosophy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in childhood & philosophy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites childhood & philosophy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026