Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki

239 papers and 209 indexed citations i.

About

The 239 papers published in Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki in the last decades have received a total of 209 indexed citations. Papers published in Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki usually cover Cultural Studies (109 papers), Communication (93 papers) and Language and Linguistics (51 papers) specifically the topics of Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication (108 papers), Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies (91 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki are Alan Cienki, О. Н. Ковалева, Valery Solovyev, E.A. Kozlova, Tingting Lu, Nicolau Beckmann, Wiebke Petersen and Peter Indefrey.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki.

Countries where authors publish in Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025