Psychology Learning & Teaching

4.4k citations
445 papers · · active since 2001

Impact in

  • Education top 10%
    • Student Assessment and Feedback
    • Evaluation of Teaching Practices
    • Online and Blended Learning
    • Higher Education Research Studies
    • Science Education and Pedagogy
    • Open Education and E-Learning

Papers in

    • Evaluation of Teaching Practices 81
    • Innovative Teaching Methods 42
    • Student Assessment and Feedback 40
    • Online and Blended Learning 34
    • Higher Education Research Studies 28
    • Higher Education and Employability 26

Psychology Learning & Teaching

399 papers receiving 4k citations

Peers

Psychology Learning & Teaching
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Education 2k
  • Computer Science Applications 300
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 609
  • General Psychology 65
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 360
Replace Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives with:
Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives United States
Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences United States
International Journal of Testing United States
Mind Brain and Education United States
International Journal of Research & Method in Education United Kingdom
Thinking & Reasoning United States
Mind Culture and Activity United States
Theory and Research in Education United States
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering United States
Qualitative Psychology United States
Psychology Learning & Teaching relative to Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives United States Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Psychology Learning & Teaching

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychology Learning & Teaching. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychology Learning & Teaching with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychology Learning & Teaching more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Psychology Learning & Teaching

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychology Learning & Teaching. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychology Learning & Teaching.

About Psychology Learning & Teaching

The 445 papers published in Psychology Learning & Teaching in the last decades have received a total of 4.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Psychology Learning & Teaching usually cover Education (300 papers), General Psychology (16 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (58 papers), Statistics and Probability (30 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (32 papers) specifically the topics of Evaluation of Teaching Practices (81 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (42 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (40 papers), Online and Blended Learning (34 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (32 papers), Statistics Education and Methodologies (30 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (28 papers) and Higher Education and Employability (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychology Learning & Teaching are Nancy Falchikov, Ann Walker, Nicole D. Anderson, Regan A. R. Gurung, Stephan Dutke, Ν. G. L. Hammond, Jonathan Barenberg, Amanda Perry, Michelle Hood and James Elander.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact