Psychology Learning & Teaching

437 papers and 3.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 437 papers published in Psychology Learning & Teaching in the last decades have received a total of 3.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychology Learning & Teaching usually cover Education (255 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (143 papers) and Social Psychology (103 papers) specifically the topics of Evaluation of Teaching Practices (120 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (75 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (72 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychology Learning & Teaching are Nancy Falchikov, Ann Walker, Regan A. R. Gurung, Nicole D. Anderson, Stephan Dutke, Jonathan Barenberg, James Elander, Michelle Hood, Stephen E. Newstead and Peter Reddy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychology Learning & Teaching

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychology Learning & Teaching. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychology Learning & Teaching.

Countries where authors publish in Psychology Learning & Teaching

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychology Learning & Teaching. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychology Learning & Teaching with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychology Learning & Teaching more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025