Documenta Praehistorica

506 papers and 3.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 506 papers published in Documenta Praehistorica in the last decades have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Documenta Praehistorica usually cover Archeology (349 papers), Paleontology (334 papers) and Anthropology (158 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (334 papers), Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (155 papers) and Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (129 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Documenta Praehistorica are Mihael Budja, Detlef Gronenborn, Yaroslav V. Kuzmin, Marek Zvelebil, Klaus Schmidt, Bernhard Weninger, Çiler Çilingiroğlu, Eszter Bánffy, Lee Clare and Julian Thomas.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Documenta Praehistorica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Documenta Praehistorica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Documenta Praehistorica.

Countries where authors publish in Documenta Praehistorica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Documenta Praehistorica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Documenta Praehistorica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Documenta Praehistorica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025