Advances in Contraception

451 papers and 4.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 451 papers published in Advances in Contraception in the last decades have received a total of 4.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Advances in Contraception usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (211 papers), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (88 papers) and Reproductive Medicine (79 papers) specifically the topics of Reproductive Health and Contraception (175 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (37 papers) and Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (36 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Advances in Contraception are Marc Verstraete, Elton Kessel, Paula J. Adams Hillard, J. I. B. Adinma, Michel Thiéry, Gaston Farr, David A. Edelman, E M Belsey, Max Elstein and István Batár.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Advances in Contraception

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Advances in Contraception. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Advances in Contraception.

Countries where authors publish in Advances in Contraception

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Advances in Contraception. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Advances in Contraception with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Advances in Contraception more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025