Labor Studies Journal

601 papers and 3.9k indexed citations

About

The 601 papers published in Labor Studies Journal in the last decades have received a total of 3.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Labor Studies Journal usually cover Public Administration (372 papers), Sociology and Political Science (167 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (133 papers) specifically the topics of Labor Movements and Unions (370 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (106 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Labor Studies Journal are Bruce Nissen, Jane Wills, Gregor Murray, Christian Lévesque, Paul Jarley, Jack Fiorito, Marcelo Vieta, Chris Smith, Ian Robinson and Robert Pollin.

In The Last Decade

Labor Studies Journal

452 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Fields of papers published in Labor Studies Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Labor Studies Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Labor Studies Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Labor Studies Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Labor Studies Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Labor Studies Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Labor Studies Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026