BioPsychoSocial Medicine

412 papers and 7.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 412 papers published in BioPsychoSocial Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 7.2k indexed citations. Papers published in BioPsychoSocial Medicine usually cover Clinical Psychology (128 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (114 papers) and General Health Professions (72 papers) specifically the topics of Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (60 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (48 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (38 papers). The most active scholars publishing in BioPsychoSocial Medicine are Mutsuhiro Nakao, Yoshiya Moriguchi, Jean Decety, Shin Fukudo, Gen Komaki, Takakazu Oka, Nagisa Sugaya, Filiberto Toledano‐Toledano, Nobuyuki Sudo and Nahathai Wongpakaran.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in BioPsychoSocial Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in BioPsychoSocial Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in BioPsychoSocial Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in BioPsychoSocial Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in BioPsychoSocial Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in BioPsychoSocial Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BioPsychoSocial Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025