Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences

8.5k citations
348 papers · · active since 2014

Impact in

Papers in

Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences

322 papers receiving 7.9k citations

Peers

Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
  • General Decision Sciences 230
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.2k
  • Safety Research 683
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 821
  • Education 1.7k
Replace Communication Methods and Measures with:
Communication Methods and Measures United States
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science United States
Methodology United States
Diagnostica Germany
Social Psychology United States
Health Psychology Review United Kingdom
Swiss Journal of Psychology Switzerland
North American journal of psychology United States
Advances in child development and behavior United States
Journal of Individual Differences Germany
Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences relative to Communication Methods and Measures United States Communication Methods and Measures's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Communication Methods and Measures · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

About Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences

The 348 papers published in Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 8.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences usually cover General Decision Sciences (18 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (41 papers), Applied Psychology (10 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (38 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (26 papers) specifically the topics of Social and Intergroup Psychology (25 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (20 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (18 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (17 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (15 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (11 papers), Career Development and Diversity (10 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (9 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences are Sean H. K. Kang, Jane G. Stout, Nilanjana Dasgupta, Jessi L. Smith, Stacy J. Priniski, Judith M. Harackiewicz, Erika A. Patall, Morton Ann Gernsbacher, Naomi Ellemers and Gretchen B. Chapman.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact