Narrative Inquiry

554 papers and 8.7k indexed citations

About

The 554 papers published in Narrative Inquiry in the last decades have received a total of 8.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Narrative Inquiry usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (176 papers), Language and Linguistics (155 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (137 papers) specifically the topics of Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (131 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (101 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (76 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Narrative Inquiry are Alexandra Georgakopoulou, Michael Bamberg, Ruthellen Josselson, Anna De Fina, David Herman, Mark Freeman, Dan P. McAdams, Gabriela Spector‐Mersel, Stephanie Taylor and Neal R. Norrick.

In The Last Decade

Narrative Inquiry

462 papers receiving 7.4k citations

Fields of papers published in Narrative Inquiry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Narrative Inquiry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Narrative Inquiry.

Countries where authors publish in Narrative Inquiry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Narrative Inquiry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Narrative Inquiry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Narrative Inquiry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026