Mark Freeman

81 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Mark Freeman
Comparison fields: 5 of 163
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 71
  • General Psychology 60
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 220
  • Philosophy 174
  • Clinical Psychology 296
Replace C. G. Jung with:
C. G. Jung South Korea
Richard H. Williams United States
Kenneth Heller United States
Lawrence H. Cohen United States
Peter C. Hill United States
William Ryan United States
Thomas Blank Germany
Anthony Mulac United States
Keith E. Davis United States
Michael B. Lewis United Kingdom
Mark Freeman relative to C. G. Jung South Korea C. G. Jung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
C. G. Jung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Freeman. The network helps show where Mark Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Freeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Freeman Line = papers co-authored together Mark Freeman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 88 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Rewriting the Self: History, Memory, Narrative
1993256
2 2015161
3 2010159
4 2006115
5 195785
6 196074
7 196362
8 199857
9 199048
10 200248
11 196844
12 198737
13 199735
14 195633
15 198632
16 199931
17
The Priority of the Other: Thinking and Living Beyond the Self
201331
18 200230
19 201130
20 195829

About Mark Freeman

Mark Freeman is a scholar working on Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Clinical Psychology, having authored 88 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (14 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (9 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (6 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (6 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (4 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (4 papers) and Social Representations and Identity (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (71 citations), General Psychology (60 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (220 citations), Philosophy (174 citations) and Clinical Psychology (296 citations). Mark Freeman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Cuba. Frequent co-authors include Steven E. Katz, Kenneth J. Gergen, Ruthellen Josselson, Ignacio Tinoco, G. D. Halsey, Jaime Tisnado, Elizabeth Bossert, Ida M. Martinson, Catherine L. Gilliss and Robert Kessler. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Narrative Inquiry, New Ideas in Psychology, Theory & Psychology and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact