Discourse & Communication

493 papers and 5.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 493 papers published in Discourse & Communication in the last decades have received a total of 5.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Discourse & Communication usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (215 papers), Communication (159 papers) and Language and Linguistics (157 papers) specifically the topics of Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (211 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (127 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (92 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Discourse & Communication are Theo van Leeuwen, Ruth Page, Vijay K. Bhatia, Karen Lee Ashcraft, Katarzyna Molek‐Kozakowska, Rosalind Gill, Michelle M. Lazar, Innocent Chiluwa, Michele Zappavigna and Teun A. van Dijk.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Discourse & Communication

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Discourse & Communication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Discourse & Communication.

Countries where authors publish in Discourse & Communication

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Discourse & Communication. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Discourse & Communication with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Discourse & Communication more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025