Theory Into Practice

2.5k papers and 57.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in Theory Into Practice in the last decades have received a total of 57.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Theory Into Practice usually cover Education (1.4k papers), Sociology and Political Science (405 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (389 papers) specifically the topics of Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (419 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (156 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (145 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Theory Into Practice are David R. Krathwohl, Barry J. Zimmerman, John W. Creswell, Dana L. Miller, Gloria Ladson‐Billings, Luis C. Moll, Norma González, Cathy Amanti, Deborah Neff and Paul R. Pintrich.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Theory Into Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Theory Into Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Theory Into Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Theory Into Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Theory Into Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Theory Into Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theory Into Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025