This map shows the geographic impact of research published in NASPA Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in NASPA Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites NASPA Journal more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in NASPA Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in NASPA Journal.
About NASPA Journal
The 2.0k papers published in NASPA Journal in the last decades have received a total of 20.8k indexed citations . Papers published in NASPA Journal usually cover Education (1.0k papers), Social Psychology (398 papers), Safety Research (155 papers), Gender Studies (116 papers) and Communication (77 papers) specifically the topics of Higher Education Research Studies (684 papers), Mentoring and Academic Development (149 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (139 papers), Higher Education Practises and Engagement (108 papers), Online and Blended Learning (102 papers), Service-Learning and Community Engagement (92 papers), Higher Education Governance and Development (83 papers) and Counseling Practices and Supervision (72 papers). The most active scholars publishing in NASPA Journal are Martha Anne Kitzrow, Terrell Lamont Strayhorn, Robert Dean Reason, Annemarie Vaccaro, John D. Foubert, Keith E. Edwards, Ethan A. Kolek, Gary R. Pike, George D. Kuh and Donna M. Talbot.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.