Teaching of Psychology

3.0k papers and 33.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.0k papers published in Teaching of Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 33.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Teaching of Psychology usually cover Education (1.3k papers), General Psychology (766 papers) and Social Psychology (764 papers) specifically the topics of Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (766 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (389 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (276 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Teaching of Psychology are Gijsbert Stoet, Richard A. Griggs, R. Eric Landrum, Patricia A. Connor‐Greene, Regan A. R. Gurung, James H. Korn, Stephen F. Davis, George M. Slavich, William Buskist and William R. Balch.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Teaching of Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Teaching of Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Teaching of Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Teaching of Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Teaching of Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Teaching of Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Teaching of Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025