Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

11.5k citations
1.2k papers · · active since 2012

Impact in

Papers in

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

1.1k papers receiving 11k citations

Peers

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Comparison fields: 5 of 180
  • General Health Professions 1.6k
  • Economics and Econometrics 1.9k
  • Statistics and Probability 548
  • Health Information Management 365
  • Health Informatics 96
Replace Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research with:
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research United States
Patient United States
Ophthalmic Epidemiology United States
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science United States
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy United Kingdom
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes United States
Archives of Public Health Belgium
Evaluation & the Health Professions United States
The Lancet HIV United States
JACC Heart Failure United States
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research relative to Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research United States Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research.

About Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

The 1.2k papers published in Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research in the last decades have received a total of 11.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research usually cover Economics and Econometrics (328 papers), Statistics and Probability (109 papers), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (53 papers), General Health Professions (126 papers) and Family Practice (11 papers) specifically the topics of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (259 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (92 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (67 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (53 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (52 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (50 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (46 papers) and Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research are Laura C Esmail, Alison L. Rein, Emily Moore, Robert W. Dubois, Sreeram V Ramagopalan, Omar Mohammed Abdel-Rahman, Steven D. Pearson, Rosie Twomey, Gregg S Nelson and Sean Tunis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact