Internal Medicine

160.0k papers and 3.3M indexed citations i.

About

160.0k papers covering Internal Medicine have received a total of 3.3M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management, Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes and Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases and also cover the fields of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Some of the most active scholars covering Internal Medicine are Samuel Z. Goldhaber, Gregory Y.H. Lip, Jack Hirsh, John A. Heit, Clive Kearon, Charles T. Esmon, Jeffrey I. Weitz, Frits R. Rosendaal, Susan R. Kahn and Harry R. Büller.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Internal Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Internal Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Internal Medicine.

Countries where authors publish papers about Internal Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Internal Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Internal Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Internal Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025