Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

About

The 715 papers published in Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 11.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (139 papers), General Health Professions (112 papers) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (108 papers) specifically the topics of Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (106 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (70 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (46 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine are Arsenio Páez, Mike Clarke, Ling Huang, Chao Zhang, Yu‐Ming Niu, Xian‐Tao Zeng, Yonggang Zhang, Sheng Li, Feng Sun and Liang Du.

In The Last Decade

Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

625 papers receiving 11.2k citations

Fields of papers published in Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026