International Journal for Population Data Science

3.3k citations
900 papers · · active since 2017

Impact in

Papers in

International Journal for Population Data Science

587 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

International Journal for Population Data Science
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
  • Health Informatics 57
  • Health Information Management 135
  • Health 195
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 79
  • Management Science and Operations Research 260
Replace Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research with:
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research United States
Health Economics Review Germany
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications United States
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation United States
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science United States
Healthcare policy Canada
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research United States
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine China
The Health Care Manager United States
Health Marketing Quarterly United States
International Journal for Population Data Science relative to Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research United States Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Journal for Population Data Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal for Population Data Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal for Population Data Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal for Population Data Science more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Journal for Population Data Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal for Population Data Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal for Population Data Science.

About International Journal for Population Data Science

The 900 papers published in International Journal for Population Data Science in the last decades have received a total of 3.3k indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal for Population Data Science usually cover Health (119 papers), Health Information Management (54 papers), Management Science and Operations Research (155 papers), General Health Professions (211 papers) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (18 papers) specifically the topics of Data Quality and Management (123 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (100 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (62 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (62 papers), demographic modeling and climate adaptation (35 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (33 papers), Medical Coding and Health Information (33 papers) and Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging (28 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal for Population Data Science are Kerina Helen Jones, Ronan Anthony Lyons, Ruth E. Gilbert, David Vincent Ford, Katie L. Harron, Simon Thompson, Michael J. Schull, Kimberlyn Marie McGrail, Matthew Alexander Jay and Hude Quan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact