Evidence-Based Mental Health

486 papers and 12.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 486 papers published in Evidence-Based Mental Health in the last decades have received a total of 12.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Evidence-Based Mental Health usually cover Clinical Psychology (164 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (163 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (80 papers) specifically the topics of Schizophrenia research and treatment (76 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (75 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (51 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Evidence-Based Mental Health are Gerta Rücker, Guido Schwarzer, Sara Balduzzi, Michael H. Boyle, Dimitris Mavridis, Georgia Salanti, Paolo Fusar‐Poli, Joaquim Raduà, Orestis Efthimiou and John Geddes.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Evidence-Based Mental Health

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Evidence-Based Mental Health. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Evidence-Based Mental Health.

Countries where authors publish in Evidence-Based Mental Health

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Evidence-Based Mental Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Evidence-Based Mental Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evidence-Based Mental Health more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025