Quality Management in Health Care

1.1k papers and 11.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Quality Management in Health Care in the last decades have received a total of 11.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Quality Management in Health Care usually cover General Health Professions (447 papers), Economics and Econometrics (254 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (152 papers) specifically the topics of Healthcare Policy and Management (164 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (162 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (142 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quality Management in Health Care are Jean Gayton Carroll, Charles M. Kilo, Bozena Poksińska, V. Susan Carroll, Theodore Speroff, Farrokh Alemi, Gerald T. O’Connor, Donald M. Berwick, Eugene C. Nelson and James R. Langabeer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Quality Management in Health Care

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Quality Management in Health Care. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quality Management in Health Care.

Countries where authors publish in Quality Management in Health Care

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quality Management in Health Care. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quality Management in Health Care with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quality Management in Health Care more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025