Biotechnology Progress

5.7k papers and 171.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.7k papers published in Biotechnology Progress in the last decades have received a total of 171.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Biotechnology Progress usually cover Molecular Biology (3.8k papers), Biomedical Engineering (1.7k papers) and Biotechnology (672 papers) specifically the topics of Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (1.3k papers), Protein purification and stability (1.2k papers) and Metabolic Engineering and Synthetic Biology (740 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biotechnology Progress are Bohumil Volesky, Michael L. Shuler, F. Xavier Malcata, Murali Sastry, Charles E. Wyman, Bernhard Ø. Palsson, Shang‐Tian Yang, Martin L. Yarmush, Pratima Bajpai and Royston Jefferis.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Biotechnology Progress

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biotechnology Progress. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biotechnology Progress.

Countries where authors publish in Biotechnology Progress

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biotechnology Progress. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biotechnology Progress with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biotechnology Progress more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025