Filtration and Separation

74.3k papers and 1.8M indexed citations i.

About

74.3k papers covering Filtration and Separation have received a total of 1.8M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions, Thermodynamic properties of mixtures and Crystallization and Solubility Studies and also cover the fields of Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Organic Chemistry and Materials Chemistry. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering. Some of the most active scholars covering Filtration and Separation are Yizhak Marcus, W. J. Geary, William L. Jorgensen, Michael L. Klein, Kenneth S. Pitzer, Jayaraman Chandrasekhar, Jeffry D. Madura, Roger Impey, Frank J. Millero and Andrew G. Dickson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Filtration and Separation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Filtration and Separation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Filtration and Separation.

Countries where authors publish papers about Filtration and Separation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Filtration and Separation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Filtration and Separation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Filtration and Separation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025