Trends in biotechnology

4.4k papers and 313.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.4k papers published in Trends in biotechnology in the last decades have received a total of 313.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Trends in biotechnology usually cover Molecular Biology (2.6k papers), Biomedical Engineering (912 papers) and Plant Science (484 papers) specifically the topics of CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (443 papers), Metabolic Engineering and Synthetic Biology (399 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (267 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Trends in biotechnology are Yusuf Chisti, Sang Yup Lee, Sergio Riva, Korneel Rabaey, Jin‐Woo Bae, Thomas Gaj, Robert D. Possee, Na-Ri Shin, Tae Woong Whon and Carlos F. Barbas.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Trends in biotechnology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Trends in biotechnology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Trends in biotechnology.

Countries where authors publish in Trends in biotechnology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Trends in biotechnology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Trends in biotechnology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trends in biotechnology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025