Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects

534.8k citations
15.4k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Biochemistry top 0.5%
    • Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism
    • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
    • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology

Papers in

    • Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism 650
    • Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research 562
    • Hemoglobin structure and function 371

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects

14.1k papers receiving 458.5k citations

Peers

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects
Comparison fields: 5 of 236
  • Biochemistry 29.3k
  • Molecular Biology 256.3k
  • Cell Biology 56.1k
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 43.1k
  • Clinical Biochemistry 18.7k
Replace Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences with:
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences United States
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes United States
Annual Review of Biochemistry United States
Life Sciences United States
Biochemical Society Transactions United Kingdom
The Journal of Biochemistry Japan
Experimental Biology and Medicine United States
Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology United States
Journal of Cellular Physiology United States
Advances in experimental medicine and biology United States
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects relative to Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences United States Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects.

About Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects

The 15.4k papers published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects in the last decades have received a total of 534.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects usually cover Biochemistry (1.1k papers), Cell Biology (2.0k papers), Clinical Biochemistry (778 papers), Molecular Biology (7.6k papers) and Nutrition and Dietetics (1.0k papers) specifically the topics of Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1.2k papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (650 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (633 papers), Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (562 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (549 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (471 papers), Polyamine Metabolism and Applications (455 papers) and Hemoglobin structure and function (371 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects are Jean‐Marie Briantais, Neil R. Baker, Bernard Genty, Shelly C. Lu, Rolf Apweiler, Joseph W. DePierre, Bengt Mannervik, Matilde Maiorino, Gordon M. Cragg and David Newman.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact