AMS Review

286 papers and 4.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 286 papers published in AMS Review in the last decades have received a total of 4.2k indexed citations. Papers published in AMS Review usually cover Marketing (186 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (91 papers) and Strategy and Management (76 papers) specifically the topics of Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (109 papers), Service and Product Innovation (68 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (59 papers). The most active scholars publishing in AMS Review are Elina Jaakkola, Shelby D. Hunt, Kevin Lane Keller, John Hulland, O. C. Ferrell, Rajan Varadarajan, Aric Rindfleisch, Russell W. Belk, William Sun and Manjit S. Yadav.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in AMS Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in AMS Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in AMS Review.

Countries where authors publish in AMS Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in AMS Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in AMS Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites AMS Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025