Quantitative Science Studies

312 papers and 4.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 312 papers published in Quantitative Science Studies in the last decades have received a total of 4.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Quantitative Science Studies usually cover Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (179 papers), Information Systems and Management (65 papers) and Information Systems (60 papers) specifically the topics of scientometrics and bibliometrics research (178 papers), Research Data Management Practices (40 papers) and Complex Network Analysis Techniques (32 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quantitative Science Studies are Ludo Waltman, Mike Thelwall, Jonathan Adams, Nees Jan van Eck, Reza Karimi, Michiel Schotten, Andrew Plume, Grégoire Côté, Jeroen Baas and David Pendlebury.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Quantitative Science Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Quantitative Science Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quantitative Science Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Quantitative Science Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quantitative Science Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quantitative Science Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quantitative Science Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025