University of Maryland, Baltimore

76.1k papers receiving 3.0M citations

Peers

University of Maryland, Baltimore
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Endocrinology 98.5k
  • Biological Psychiatry 36.5k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 208.3k
  • Molecular Biology 774.9k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 136.0k
Replace Johns Hopkins Medicine with:
Johns Hopkins Medicine United States
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill United States
Duke Medical Center United States
Albert Einstein College of Medicine United States
Duke University Hospital United States
United States Department of Veterans Affairs United States
Tufts University United States
Case Western Reserve University United States
National Cancer Institute United States
University of Rochester United States
University of Maryland, Baltimore relative to Johns Hopkins Medicine United States Johns Hopkins Medicine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Johns Hopkins Medicine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Maryland, Baltimore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Maryland, Baltimore. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Maryland, Baltimore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Maryland, Baltimore more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Maryland, Baltimore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Maryland, Baltimore at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Maryland, Baltimore at the time of their publication.

About University of Maryland, Baltimore

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Maryland, Baltimore have published 88.4k papers, which have received a total of 3.5M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.5k papers in Endocrinology, 2.2k papers in Emergency Medicine, 4.5k papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 1.0k papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and 4.1k papers in Infectious Diseases on the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1.9k papers), Ion channel regulation and function (1.6k papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (1.1k papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (985 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (951 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (935 papers), Escherichia coli research studies (929 papers) and HIV Research and Treatment (842 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Endocrinology (98.5k citations), Biological Psychiatry (36.5k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (208.3k citations), Molecular Biology (774.9k citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (136.0k citations). Authors at University of Maryland, Baltimore collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and China and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Biological Chemistry, PLoS ONE, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Clinical Oncology. Some of University of Maryland, Baltimore's most productive authors include Joseph R. Lakowicz, Harris Chaiklin, Alexander D. MacKerell, James B. Kaper, Alessio Fasano, Marc C. Hochberg, James P. Nataro, Myron M. Levine, Margaret M. McCarthy and Harry L. T. Mobley.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact