University of New Mexico

60.8k papers receiving 2.2M citations

Peers

University of New Mexico
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Ecological Modeling 26.5k
  • Ecology 157.3k
  • Paleontology 43.7k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 111.5k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 70.4k
Replace Arizona State University with:
Arizona State University United States
University of Colorado Boulder United States
University of Arizona United States
Texas Tech University United States
University of Utah United States
Colorado State University United States
University of Wyoming United States
Brigham Young University United States
University of Oklahoma United States
The University of Texas at Austin United States
University of New Mexico relative to Arizona State University United States Arizona State University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Arizona State University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of New Mexico

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of New Mexico. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of New Mexico with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of New Mexico more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of New Mexico

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of New Mexico at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of New Mexico at the time of their publication.

About University of New Mexico

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of New Mexico have published 68.0k papers, which have received a total of 2.4M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4.8k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 1.1k papers in Paleontology, 2.3k papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 501 papers in Ecological Modeling and 2.9k papers in Ecology on the topics of Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (1.0k papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (994 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (894 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (802 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (790 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (774 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (741 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (698 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (26.5k citations), Ecology (157.3k citations), Paleontology (43.7k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (111.5k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (70.4k citations). Authors at University of New Mexico collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Physical Review A, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Applied Physics Letters and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Some of University of New Mexico's most productive authors include William R. Rice, James H. Brown, William R. Miller, Vince D. Calhoun, Vojo P. Deretic, Hua Claria Guo, Gary A. Rosenberg, Randy Thornhill, Stephanie Forrest and Steven W. Gangestad.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact