Temple College

262.9k citations
8.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Temple College

7.1k papers receiving 235.7k citations

Peers

Temple College
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 21.3k
  • Clinical Psychology 31.6k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 13.9k
  • Social Psychology 26.4k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 16.6k
Replace The University of Texas at San Antonio with:
The University of Texas at San Antonio United States
Baylor University United States
The University of Texas at Dallas United States
The University of Texas at Arlington United States
Texas Christian University United States
University of North Texas United States
Southern Methodist University United States
Texas State University United States
Oklahoma State University Oklahoma City United States
John Brown University United States
Temple College relative to The University of Texas at San Antonio United States The University of Texas at San Antonio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
The University of Texas at San Antonio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Temple College

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Temple College. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Temple College with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Temple College more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Temple College

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Temple College at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Temple College at the time of their publication.

About Temple College

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Temple College have published 8.7k papers, which have received a total of 262.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 510 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 663 papers in Clinical Psychology, 427 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 575 papers in Social Psychology and 256 papers in Gender Studies on the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (290 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (180 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (149 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (127 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (114 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (112 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (105 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (104 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental and Educational Psychology (21.3k citations), Clinical Psychology (31.6k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (13.9k citations), Social Psychology (26.4k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (16.6k citations). Authors at Temple College collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Black Studies, Child Development, Psychology in the Schools, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery and Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research. Some of Temple College's most productive authors include Laurence Steinberg, Aneta Pavlenko, Gary Blau, Lynn Hasher, Rose T. Zacks, Jayanthi Krishnan, Nora S. Newcombe, János Galambos, Roberta Michnick Golinkoff and Jagan Krishnan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact