Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery

906.1k citations
37.6k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Surgery top 0.1%
    • Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
    • Breast Implant and Reconstruction
    • Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
    • Body Contouring and Surgery
  • Dermatology top 0.1%
    • Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques

Papers in

    • Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques 2.5k
  • Surgery 20.2k
    • Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques 7.7k
    • Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques 4.6k
    • Breast Implant and Reconstruction 3.4k
    • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 1.8k
    • Body Contouring and Surgery 1.6k

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery

31.4k papers receiving 782.9k citations

Peers

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
Comparison fields: 5 of 247
  • Surgery 519.0k
  • Dermatology 103.5k
  • Rehabilitation 45.8k
  • Transplantation 14.6k
  • Otorhinolaryngology 19.1k
Replace The Lancet with:
The Lancet United Kingdom
JAMA United States
New England Journal of Medicine United States
Journal of Clinical Investigation United States
Radiology United States
Blood United States
Annals of Internal Medicine United States
Annals of Surgery United States
International Journal of Molecular Sciences China
PEDIATRICS United States
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery relative to The Lancet United Kingdom The Lancet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
The Lancet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery.

About Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery

The 37.6k papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery in the last decades have received a total of 906.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery usually cover Dermatology (4.3k papers), Surgery (20.2k papers), Transplantation (1.2k papers), Developmental Biology (497 papers) and Rehabilitation (1.3k papers) specifically the topics of Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (7.7k papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (4.6k papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (3.4k papers), Cleft Lip and Palate Research (2.6k papers), Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (2.5k papers), Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments (2.3k papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1.8k papers) and Body Contouring and Surgery (1.6k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery are Rod J. Rohrich, John B. Mulliken, Hal G. Bingham, Kevin C. Chung, David A. Hidalgo, Bahman Guyuron, Jeffrey E. Janis, Peter G. Cordeiro, Scott L. Spear and Rollin K. Daniel.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact