John Brown University

13.1k papers receiving 542.8k citations

Peers

John Brown University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 46.6k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 27.6k
  • Economics and Econometrics 56.5k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 38.2k
  • Applied Psychology 9.1k
Replace The University of Texas at Dallas with:
The University of Texas at Dallas United States
University of Oklahoma United States
Iowa State University United States
Rice University United States
Southern Methodist University United States
University of North Texas United States
The University of Texas at Arlington United States
Oklahoma State University United States
University of Houston United States
University of Kansas United States
John Brown University relative to The University of Texas at Dallas United States The University of Texas at Dallas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
The University of Texas at Dallas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at John Brown University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at John Brown University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at John Brown University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Brown University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at John Brown University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with John Brown University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with John Brown University at the time of their publication.

About John Brown University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with John Brown University have published 15.8k papers, which have received a total of 604.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 109 papers in General Decision Sciences, 197 papers in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, 224 papers in Applied Psychology, 578 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 744 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience on the topics of Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (266 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (255 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (189 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (169 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (164 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (161 papers), Distributed systems and fault tolerance (158 papers) and Economic theories and models (155 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (46.6k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (27.6k citations), Economics and Econometrics (56.5k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (38.2k citations) and Applied Psychology (9.1k citations). Authors at John Brown University collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Physics Today, Journal of Vision, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, Quarterly of Applied Mathematics and Journal of American History. Some of John Brown University's most productive authors include James Hays, Lawrence Sirovich, David Weil, Peter Howitt, Chi‐Wang Shu, Philippe Aghion, James Mahoney, Serge Belongie, Tsung-Yi Lin and Deva Ramanan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact