National Institute for Food and Nutrition Science
Impact in
- Biochemistry top 10%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Papers in
- Biochemistry 41
- Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress 28
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities 19
- Top scholars
- B LányiAndrea LugasiEmese KápolnaIstván SiróLájos HelyesZoltán PékJ. HóváriAnna Blázovics
- Journals
- Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism (17 papers)Phytotherapy Research (8 papers)European Journal of Public Health (7 papers)Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture (6 papers)International Journal of Cancer (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- HungaryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
National Institute for Food and Nutrition Science
350 papers receiving 9.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 206
- Biochemistry 1.2k
- Food Science 1.8k
- Nutrition and Dietetics 1.3k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.6k
- Animal Science and Zoology 538
Countries citing scholars working at National Institute for Food and Nutrition Science
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Institute for Food and Nutrition Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Institute for Food and Nutrition Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Institute for Food and Nutrition Science more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Institute for Food and Nutrition Science
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Institute for Food and Nutrition Science at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Institute for Food and Nutrition Science at the time of their publication.
About National Institute for Food and Nutrition Science
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Institute for Food and Nutrition Science have published 445 papers, which have received a total of 10.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 41 papers in Biochemistry, 43 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics, 65 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 12 papers in Endocrinology and 24 papers in Animal Science and Zoology on the topics of Nutritional Studies and Diet (43 papers), Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (28 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (22 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (19 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (15 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (13 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (11 papers) and Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (11 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biochemistry (1.2k citations), Food Science (1.8k citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (1.3k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.6k citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (538 citations). Authors at National Institute for Food and Nutrition Science collaborate with scholars in Hungary, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, Phytotherapy Research, European Journal of Public Health, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture and International Journal of Cancer. Some of National Institute for Food and Nutrition Science's most productive authors include B Lányi, Andrea Lugasi, Emese Kápolna, István Siró, Lájos Helyes, Zoltán Pék, J. Hóvári, Anna Blázovics, Lajos Bíró and G. Bíró.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.