Michigan Technological University

20k papers receiving 604.1k citations

Peers

Michigan Technological University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Atmospheric Science 26k
  • Global and Planetary Change 33.2k
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 37k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 15.2k
  • Automotive Engineering 13.5k
Replace University of Waterloo with:
University of Waterloo Canada
University of Windsor Canada
University of Toledo United States
North Dakota State University United States
Lakehead University Canada
Southern Illinois University Carbondale United States
University of Minnesota, Duluth United States
Ohio University United States
Clemson University United States
Carleton University Canada
Michigan Technological University relative to University of Waterloo Canada University of Waterloo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
University of Waterloo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Michigan Technological University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Michigan Technological University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Michigan Technological University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michigan Technological University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Michigan Technological University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Michigan Technological University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Michigan Technological University at the time of their publication.

About Michigan Technological University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Michigan Technological University have published 21k papers, which have received a total of 605k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 463 papers in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, 566 papers in Automotive Engineering, 270 papers in Architecture, 1.2k papers in Civil and Structural Engineering and 614 papers in Atmospheric Science on the topics of Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation (521 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (398 papers), Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (351 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (328 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (265 papers), Microstructure and mechanical properties (243 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (210 papers) and Geological and Geochemical Analysis (202 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Atmospheric Science (26k citations), Global and Planetary Change (33.2k citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (37k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (15.2k citations) and Automotive Engineering (13.5k citations). Authors at Michigan Technological University collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Construction and Building Materials, Journal of Great Lakes Research, Metallurgical Transactions A and Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. Some of Michigan Technological University's most productive authors include Elias C. Aifantis, Joshua M. Pearce, Yun Hang Hu, Zhanping You, Kurt S. Pregitzer, William I. Rose, Ravindra Pandey, Jaroslaw Wieslaw Drelich, Wilbur H. Campbell and Qingli Dai.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact