Clemson University

1.4M citations
51.3k papers ·

Impact in

    • Graphene research and applications
    • Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications
    • Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
    • Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices

Papers in

Clemson University

46.4k papers receiving 1.3M citations

Peers

Clemson University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Biomaterials 54.8k
  • Materials Chemistry 182.1k
  • Biomedical Engineering 154.5k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 35.6k
  • Automotive Engineering 40.1k
Replace University of South Carolina with:
University of South Carolina United States
University of Tennessee at Knoxville United States
University of Kentucky United States
Auburn University United States
Virginia Tech United States
Vanderbilt University United States
University of Virginia United States
University of Georgia United States
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill United States
University of Alabama United States
Clemson University relative to University of South Carolina United States University of South Carolina's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
University of South Carolina · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Clemson University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Clemson University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Clemson University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clemson University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Clemson University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Clemson University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Clemson University at the time of their publication.

About Clemson University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Clemson University have published 51.3k papers, which have received a total of 1.4M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 222 papers in Architecture, 649 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 1.3k papers in Automotive Engineering, 3.8k papers in Plant Science and 1.2k papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation on the topics of Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (474 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (413 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (410 papers), Plant and animal studies (408 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (408 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (403 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (395 papers) and Graphene research and applications (375 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biomaterials (54.8k citations), Materials Chemistry (182.1k citations), Biomedical Engineering (154.5k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (35.6k citations) and Automotive Engineering (40.1k citations). Authors at Clemson University collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Poultry Science, HortScience, Plant Disease, PLoS ONE and SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. Some of Clemson University's most productive authors include Roger A. Horn, Charles R. Johnson, Ya‐Ping Sun, Terry M. Tritt, Andrew T. Duchowski, Gene H. Haertling, Ian D. Walker, Henry J. Rack, Tanju Karanfil and Philip L. Roth.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact