University of Windsor

24k papers receiving 560.4k citations

Peers

University of Windsor
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 17.2k
  • Developmental Biology 3.4k
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 12.4k
  • Ecology 26.6k
  • Geophysics 15.6k
Replace University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee with:
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee United States
York University Canada
University of Waterloo Canada
Syracuse University United States
Miami University United States
University of Illinois System United States
Bowling Green State University United States
University of Toledo United States
Kent State University United States
Ohio University United States
University of Windsor relative to University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee United States University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.5×
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Windsor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Windsor. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Windsor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Windsor more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Windsor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Windsor at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Windsor at the time of their publication.

About University of Windsor

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Windsor have published 25.5k papers, which have received a total of 563.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 161 papers in Developmental Biology, 371 papers in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, 384 papers in Signal Processing, 440 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and 440 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation on the topics of Atomic and Molecular Physics (490 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (382 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (316 papers), Synthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds (285 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (276 papers), Digital Filter Design and Implementation (264 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (243 papers) and Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (241 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (17.2k citations), Developmental Biology (3.4k citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (12.4k citations), Ecology (26.6k citations) and Geophysics (15.6k citations). Authors at University of Windsor collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Physical Review A, Journal of Great Lakes Research, Canadian Journal of Chemistry and Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. Some of University of Windsor's most productive authors include Hugh J. MacIsaac, Douglas W. Stephan, Q. M. Jonathan Wu, A.T. Alpas, D. O. Northwood, Hoda A. ElMaraghy, Stephen J. Loeb, Byron P. Rourke, Ricardo Flavio Aroca and Alan S. Trenhaile.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact