Carleton University

1.2M citations
47.3k papers ·

Impact in

    • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
    • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Ecology top 1%
    • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
    • Physiological and biochemical adaptations

Papers in

Carleton University

42.5k papers receiving 1.1M citations

Peers

Carleton University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 57.2k
  • Ecology 111.0k
  • Computer Networks and Communications 94.4k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 12.6k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 50.7k
Replace Queen's University with:
Queen's University Canada
Université de Montréal Canada
State University of New York United States
Dartmouth College United States
University of Massachusetts Amherst United States
Université du Québec à Montréal Canada
University of Connecticut United States
Syracuse University United States
Université Laval Canada
University of Delaware United States
Carleton University relative to Queen's University Canada Queen's University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Queen's University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Carleton University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Carleton University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Carleton University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carleton University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Carleton University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Carleton University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Carleton University at the time of their publication.

About Carleton University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Carleton University have published 47.3k papers, which have received a total of 1.2M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4.7k papers in Computer Networks and Communications, 681 papers in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, 1.5k papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 3.0k papers in Ecology and 5.9k papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering on the topics of Fish Ecology and Management Studies (957 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (914 papers), Cooperative Communication and Network Coding (735 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (733 papers), Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization (688 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (669 papers), Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (607 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (580 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (57.2k citations), Ecology (111.0k citations), Computer Networks and Communications (94.4k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (12.6k citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (50.7k citations). Authors at Carleton University collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Medical Physics, IEEE Access, PLoS ONE and IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques. Some of Carleton University's most productive authors include Lenore Fahrig, Kenneth B. Storey, Fei Richard Yu, Steven J. Cooke, Hymie Anisman, Tom N. Tombaugh, Maria C. DeRosa, Halim Yanıkömeroğlu, Monique Sénéchal and Richard E. Ernst.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact